Civil Rights in Public Education
www.CRIPEweb.org
 

Home
Why One School System?
Not Carved in Stone
Submission to U.N. April 1997
Submission to U.N. November 2005
White River Fiasco
Lies, Evasions, Propaganda
Minority Rights? No!
School Referendum
Research notes
Write Letters
How To Contact Us
Research Note  #8
Quebec’s change to Linguistic Schools
 
            The following text is made up of excerpts from the 1997 “Report of the Special Joint Committee to amend Section 93 of the Constitution Act, 1867, concerning the Quebec School System”
 
            The modernization of the Quebec school system has been a topic of study and discussion since the early 1960s. The major aspect of that modernization has been the reorga­nization of the Quebec school sys­tem (historically organized along denominational lines in accordance with the obligations set out in sec­tion 93) into language-based struc­tures.
            The introductory clause to section 93 of the Constitution Act, 1867, gives the provinces legislative juris­diction over education. Paragraphs (1) to (4), which deal only with de­nominational rights and privileges, impose certain obligations on the provinces in respect of the public school system. Specifically, with respect to Quebec, section 93(1) entrenches the rights of Roman Catholic and Protestant groups to acquire and maintain denomina­tional school structures in the cities of Montreal and Quebec, and sec­tion 93(2) gives the members of those two faiths, outside of Mon­treal and Quebec City, the right to dissentient schools when those per­sons are in a minority.
            Sections 93(3) and (4) establish a right to appeal to the Governor General in Council, in the event that legislation enacted by a province does not comply with sections 93(1) and (2), and specify that the federal Parliament has the power to legislate in the event that a province fails to enact the legisla­tion required for compliance with section 93.
 
CONCERNS
            A number of witnesses stressed the importance of preserving de­nominational education in Quebec. After exempting the province of Quebec from the application of sections 93(1) to (4), the Quebec Public Education Act., which has a notwithstanding clause addressing both the Canadian and Quebec Charters, may allow Roman Catholic and Protestant denomina­tional education to continue.
            According to some witnesses, providing educational guarantees only to Roman Catholics and Protestants is inconsistent with con­temporary values as expressed in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms. Some witnesses opposed the preservation of denominational guarantees within the new linguistic school boards on the ground that structures of this nature would be expensive, would fragment the sys­tem and would be divisive.
 
CONSENSUS
            The Committee decided at the outset that it should not simply rubber-stamp the request. The Committee has heard from a cross-section of witnesses interested in, or affected by, the proposed amendment: we heard from individ­uals and groups, both supporting and opposing the amendment. The testimony heard showed that there is near unanimity in favour of estab­lishing linguistic school boards.
            Because section 93 relates to the rights of two religious groups, the committee wanted to know the opinion of those groups concerning the proposed amendment. Given the evidence we have heard, we have no doubt that there is a con­sensus in Quebec which favours the proposed amendment to s. 93.
 
CONCLUSION
            The substance of the provi­sions in Quebec's Public Edu­cation Act for Roman Catholic and Protestant denominational education is similar to that of the guarantees provided by sec­tion 93 of the Constitution Act, 1867.
            Some, who may be uneasy about this shift from constitu­tional to non-constitutional en­actments for Roman Catholic and Protestant denominational education in Quebec, may find additional security in the fact that the Canadian Charter's section 33 notwithstanding clause has been invoked to pro­tect parts of the Public Educa­tion Act from Charter scrutiny, provided that the Quebec Na­tional Assembly continues to renew that notwithstanding provision in the Act.
            As we stated earlier, the Committee was particularly concerned about support for the proposed amendment within these groups which would be particularly affected by the change. In other words, we looked for a consensus within two principal groups: Quebec Protestants, and Quebec Roman Catholics.
            Overall, it appears that, al­though some witnesses ex­pressed their concerns with re­spect to the proposed amend­ment, there is a consensus in Quebec society supporting this change.
Recommendation
The Special Joint Committee recommended that both Houses of Parliament adopt the resolu­tion to amend section 93 of the Constitution Act, 1867, in the form tabled in the House of Commons on October 1, 1997, and in the Senate on October 9, 1997.
Dissenters
Senator Dalia Wood and the Reform Party of Canada.
 
 
The House of Commons passed the amendment by a vote of 204 to 59 on Nov. 18, 1997.
 
AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF CANADA, CONSTITUTION ACT, 1867
1. The Constitution Act, 1867, is amended by adding, immediately after section 93, the following:
"93A. Paragraphs (1) to (4) of section 93 do not apply to Quebec."
2. This amendment may be cited as the Constitution Amendment, year of proclamation (Quebec).
 
Quebec report recommends secular public schools;
a model for Ontario?
 
            After the Quebec constitutional amendment of 1997, a The Quebec government com­missioned a report which was re­leased on March 31, 1999. The "Task Force on the Place of Relig­ion in Schools in Quebec" pro­poses a school system that breaks all ties with religious groups and recommends that the current de­nominational status of schools be revoked.
            In December of 1997, Quebec and Newfoundland received fed­eral approval to eliminate their constitutional obligations to pro­vide public funds for denomina­tional schools, and for Quebec to organize its school system on lan­guage rather than religion.
The Roman Catholic bishops of Quebec did not oppose the change to linguistic schools because there was an agreement to maintain the religious education guarantees.
            The Task Force, chaired by Jean-Pierre Proulx of the University of Montreal and a devout Roman Catholic, was composed of a care­fully-selected group that represents a cross-section of faiths and cul­tures. Their recommendations were unanimous.
            The complete report, commonly called the Proulx Report, is about 300 pages long. Its significance lies in the conclusions and recom­mendations which are reprinted be­low. (Bold highlighting by editor.)
 
Conclusions
            The major events that have marked the recent history of our school system, namely, the 1997 amendments to the Constitution Act, 1867 and the crea­tion, in 1998, of Quebec's linguistic school boards, led us naturally to con­tinue the debate launched by the Es­tates General on Education in 1996 regarding the place of religion in schools. Additional incentive to take up this debate collectively and, we hope, bring it to a close was provided by cultural and demographic changes, and by the organizational problems involved in denomina­tional schooling.
            The Task Force is submitting its con­clusions in the form of a brief series of recommendations intended to serve as a basis for public discussion. These recommendations clearly represent a break with the tradi­tion that has prevailed in Quebec for more than a century. They amount to a proposal that, in the fu­ture, our education system be une­quivocally based on respect for the right to equality and respect for freedom of conscience and religion. In 1975, the National Assembly en­throned the right to equality and free­dom of conscience and religion in the Charter of Human Rights and Free­doms. Like the National Assembly, we believe that this right and this freedom, with the other fundamental rights guaranteed in the Quebec Char­ter, are the "foundation of justice and peace." We have come to the conclusion that to provide for the full exercise of these rights, Quebec must replace its current denomina­tional school system by a secular school system and consequently re­define the place of religion in schools.
            This redefinition implies seculariza­tion in the broad sense of the term. Within the framework of schools based on common values shared by all citizens, it allows for the study of religions from a cultural perspective as well as secular world views. It ac­knowledges the spiritual dimension and therefore allows schools to offer common religious and spiritual sup­port services, if they so desire. It also allows schools, as part of their role in the community and taking into ac­count their priorities, to make their facilities available outside school hours to the various religious groups that wish to provide religious services at their own expense to members of their faith.
            We have taken great care to ground our recommendations on the most ra­tional arguments possible. Our pur­pose in holding the consultations, con­ducting the studies and discussions, and submitting the recommendations we have the honour of presenting in this report was to provide the Minister of Education, Government, the mem­bers of the National Assembly and all of those who choose to take part in the debate with ample background to fuel their participation in this debate.
Recommendations:
            1. We recommend that the Gov­ernment of Quebec and the Na­tional Assembly confirm the primacy of me right to equal­ity and freedom of conscience and religion guaranteed in the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and, conse­quently, that they repeal or not renew the current notwithstand­ing clauses in education legisla­tion which override the applica­tion of the Charters.
            2. We recommend that legisla­tion be enacted to establish a secular system of public schools dispensing preschool, elementary and secondary education.
            3. We recommend that the cur­rent denominational statuses held by public schools be re­voked.
            4. We recommend that the Edu­cation Act be amended to stipulate that the values and beliefs of religious groups cannot be used as criteria to set up a public school for the purposes of a specific project.
            5. We recommend that the basic school regulations for elemen­tary and secondary education provide for the study of relig­ions from a cultural perspec­tive in place of Catholic or Protestant religious instruc­tion, and that the study of re­ligions be compulsory for all students.1
            6. We recommend that programs for the study of religions from a cultural perspective be devel­oped and implemented in keep­ing with the guidelines and framework proposed by the Commission des programmes d'etudes of the Ministere de 1'Education, and with the rele­vant provisions of the Educa­tion Act
            7. We recommend that the Minis­tere de 1'Education encourage flexible measures for teacher in-service training for the study of religions from a cultural per­spective and allocate the neces­sary financial resources for such measures.
            8. We recommend that the Educa­tion Act authorize schools to provide common religious and spiritual support services for students of all faiths and that these services be publicly funded.
            9. We recommend that the Gov­ernment define the general ob­jectives of religious and spiri­tual support services in the ba­sic school regulations just as it defines those of other student services; that the local school governing boards draw up pro­grams of activities in keeping with these general objectives; that the school boards set the criteria for hiring religious sup­port specialists in keeping with these same objectives and without discrimination.
            10. We recommend that the Educa­tion Act stipulate that the local school governing boards may, outside school hours, provide facilities to religious groups that wish to dispense religious instruction or offer services at their own expense to members of their faith attending the school; and that the Act stipu­late that the governing boards must exercise this power without discrimination, taking into account priorities they may legitimately set with respect to the use of school premises.
            11.  We recommend that the provisions of the Act re­specting the Conseil su-perieur de 1 'education pertaining to the Catholic Committee and the Protes­tant Committee be re­pealed, that the provisions of the Act respecting the ministere de 1'Education pertaining to the associate deputy ministers for the Catholic and Protestant faiths also be repealed and, consequently, that the ap­propriate changes be made to the organizational struc­ture of the Ministere de 1'Education.
            12. We recommend that sec­tion 41 of the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms be amended to recognize, as stated in article 18(4) of the Interna­tional Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, "the liberty of parents and, when applicable, legal guardians to ensure the re­ligious and moral education of their children in confor­mity with their own convic­tions."
            13. We recommend that any other applicable legislative and regulatory provisions be amended in keeping with these recommenda­tions.
            14. We recommend that, should these recommenda­tions be adopted, they be implemented gradually, as follows:
 
General Provisions
a) Repeal of the notwithstanding clauses in education legislation which override the         application of the Charter of Rights
b) Amendment of section 41 of the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms.
c) Revocation, by law, of the cur­rent denominational status of public schools.
d) Abolition, by law, of the Catho­lic Committee, the Protestant Com­mittee and the        associate deputy minister positions for the Catholic and Protestant faiths.
e) Adoption of any other applicable legislative, regulatory and adminis­trative provisions,             including terms and conditions of implementation and the timetable for change.
 
Footnote
1 As explained in Chapter 9, we .are assuming that moral education will continue to be part of the elemen­tary and secondary school curricu­lum and that the attendant learning objectives will continue to be com­pulsory for all students. The model for organizing and dispensing moral education should be harmo­nized with that adopted for the study of religions from a cultural perspective.